Fresh off bringing the city of Cleveland its first championship in 52 years, LeBron James is still very much in his basketball-playing prime. Last June, he closed out one of his best playoff runs ever with a mind-boggling performance to end the finals, averaging 33.2 points (on 57.9 percent true shooting), 11.8 rebounds, 8.8 assists, 2.8 blocks and 2.4 steals per game as he led the Cavaliers back from down 2-0 to upset the Golden State Warriors.
But James also turns 32 in the middle of this upcoming NBA season — and as the cliché goes, Father Time is undefeated. (Except, apparently, in the cases of Serena Williams, Jaromir Jagr and Ryan Seacrest.) So as he approaches the decline phase of his career, it’s worth asking what LeBron might play like in his dotage, looking to his most similar historical doppelgangers for clues about the paths he might take.
James’s game has already undergone some remodeling over the years. Early in his career, LeBron was mostly an isolation/face-up scorer who wanted to drive — or pull up for midrange jumpers — and left his teammates to clean up the offensive glass. These days, James has a more diverse offensive repertoire: He can still perform the role of a wing scorer, barreling into the paint off isolations and pick-and-rolls, but he can also play off the ball — whether in the low post, as a cutter, spotting up from the outside or rolling to the basket after setting a screen — and he chips in more frequently on the offensive boards. This more well-rounded style has been successful for James over the progression of his career; he has three championships (plus three other Finals appearances) to show for it.
How will your favorite NBA team do this year? See all of our predictions for the 2016-17 season »
But in a broader sense, James is still basically who he’s always been: a do-it-all megastar. Over his entire career, he’s perennially ranked among the game’s most efficient (and highest-volume) scorers, while also grading out as a great passer and defender and an above-average rebounder. To put James’s playing style in context, I ran a model-based cluster analysis on NBA player stats going back to the ABA-NBA merger.1 In every single season of his career to date, James was classified in the same rarified group as other all-around perimeter superstars — think Michael Jordan, Russell Westbrook, Kobe Bryant during the Lakers’ 2000-02 three-peat, and Tracy McGrady in 2002-03.
The cluster analysis found nine total groups of NBA player typologies, with LeBron typifying the “all-around perimeter” class of players:
|AVG. PERCENTILE RANK|
|Versatile big man||81||54||42||92||90||D. Green|
|All-around perimeter||55||87||68||56||61||S. Curry|
|Low-usage all-around||60||41||55||47||64||T. Duncan|
|Defense/rebound big||50||7||13||77||84||S. Adams|
|1-dimension scorer||51||85||52||35||14||D. Lillard|
|Offense-only playmaker||44||52||88||13||18||I. Thomas|
|Offense/rebound big||53||45||14||80||52||B. Marjanovic|
|1-dimension shooter||58||41||35||34||20||E. Fournier|
|Non-scoring role player||12||32||49||45||55||D. Green|
That player type — the all-around perimeter star — is all the rage in today’s NBA. Nine of the top 10 players in the league in box plus/minus were classified in that category.2 For reference’s sake, here’s how the algorithm classified the top players of the 2015-16 season according to BPM (minimum 500 minutes played):
|S. Curry||+12.5||100||100||95||48||54||All-around perimeter|
|R. Westbrook||+10.0||65||99||100||71||92||All-around perimeter|
|L. James||+9.1||89||98||97||69||91||All-around perimeter|
|K. Leonard||+8.3||96||89||60||69||94||All-around perimeter|
|K. Durant||+7.9||99||98||85||71||70||All-around perimeter|
|C. Paul||+7.8||82||92||100||35||63||All-around perimeter|
|K. Lowry||+6.8||84||90||93||38||64||All-around perimeter|
|J. Harden||+6.7||92||99||97||50||40||All-around perimeter|
|D. Green||+5.8||89||50||91||81||98||Versatile big man|
|P. Millsap||+5.3||66||85||71||83||99||All-around perimeter|
|C. Aldrich||+4.8||98||47||44||97||100||Versatile big man|
|N. Jokic||+4.8||86||59||74||91||90||Versatile big man|
|A. Bogut||+4.5||97||3||64||93||100||Versatile big man|
|P. George||+4.5||67||97||79||61||71||All-around perimeter|
|T. Duncan||+4.1||36||40||66||89||99||Low-usage all-around|
|A. Horford||+4.1||75||64||72||71||93||Low-usage all-around|
|J. Butler||+4.0||72||85||81||40||59||All-around perimeter|
|P. Gasol||+4.0||39||85||81||93||97||All-around perimeter|
|K. Walker||+4.0||65||91||87||32||51||All-around perimeter|
|R. Gobert||+3.7||86||15||22||97||99||Versatile big man|
|D. Lillard||+3.7||70||98||95||23||10||1-dimension scorer|
|B. Marjanovic||+3.6||100||75||16||99||69||Offense/rebound big|
|M Ginobili||+3.6||81||82||85||37||76||All-around perimeter|
|D. Jordan||+3.4||98||21||9||99||98||Versatile big man|
|D. West||+3.4||81||45||66||72||96||Low-usage all-around|
It’s no surprise that many of James’s most comparable players according to our CARMELO projection system — Hall of Fame talents such as Larry Bird, Julius Erving, Dwyane Wade and Scottie Pippen — also spent the majority of their careers through age 31 in the same all-around perimeter category as MJ and King James. A few of James’s top comps were classified in other groups — Charles Barkley, Karl Malone and Kevin Garnett were “versatile bigs,” essentially the big-man version of James’s do-it-all group (think of Barkley, KG and David Robinson as the archetypes), and Pippen spent a few years in the same “low-usage all-around” cluster as other efficient, passing-and-defense players like Alvin Robertson, Manu Ginobili and a young Magic Johnson. But James’s basketball DNA to this point has mostly been grounded in the tradition of the versatile perimeter prodigy.
Many of James’s historical peers saw their role change after their 32nd birthday, however. Some, like Pippen and Jason Kidd, saw their usage rates decline as they morphed back into the low-usage all-around mold in which they’d begun their careers. Others, such as Bryant, Dominique Wilkins and Alex English, retained their usage but became more one-dimensional, letting some combination of their assists, rebounds and defense slide as they focused more on scoring. (Gary Payton slid into an entirely different category — offense-only playmakers, passers whose rebounding and even defense slipped with age later in their careers.)
|PLAYER||THROUGH AGE 31||AFTER AGE 31||WAR NEXT 5 YEARS|
|L. James||All-around perimeter||—||—|
|S. Pippen||All-around perimeter||Low-usage all-around||+36.8|
|J. Kidd||All-around perimeter||Low-usage all-around||+52.0|
|L. Bird||All-around perimeter||No change||+28.8|
|J. Erving||All-around perimeter||No change||+51.3|
|D. Wade||All-around perimeter||No change||—|
|C. Drexler||All-around perimeter||No change||+45.9|
|V. Carter||All-around perimeter||No change||+23.2|
|P. Pierce||All-around perimeter||No change||+37.6|
|K. Bryant||All-around perimeter||One-dimension scorer||+27.9|
|D. Wilkins||All-around perimeter||One-dimension scorer||+18.9|
|A. English||All-around perimeter||One-dimension scorer||+22.5|
|G. Payton||All-around perimeter||Offense-only playmaker||+41.4|
|K. Abdul-Jabbar||Versatile big man||All-around perimeter||+61.9|
|C. Barkley||Versatile big man||No change||+50.6|
|K.Malone||Versatile big man||No change||+77.7|
|K. Garnett||Versatile big man||No change||+37.8|
|T. Duncan||Versatile big man||No change||+41.2|
|H. Olajuwon||Versatile big man||No change||+43.0|
|C. Anthony||1-dimension scorer||All-around perimeter||—|
|C. Billups||Offense-only playmaker||No change||+20.0|
Just as interesting as the paths of James’s perimeter precursors, however, are the trajectories of versatile big men such as Barkley, Garnett and Robinson. Rather than losing some aspect of their skills with age and falling into a lesser archetype, the great big men most similar to James — Barkley, Malone, Garnett, Tim Duncan and Hakeem Olajuwon3 — retained their mix of valuable talents for the majority of their remaining careers. And although James himself has never been categorized among this group, the fact that a number of his similar players have (it was the second-most common classification for his comparables) and that those players ended up retaining more value from age 32 onward than their perimeter counterparts (big men averaged 52 total wins above replacement over the following five seasons, vs 36.2 for perimeter players) suggests that James’s best future could be in the paint as a big man, not out on the wing.
Of course, that transformation has already begun for James in many ways. In addition to his improved rebounding and post-up offense, he played power forward or center in Miami’s lineup 88 percent of the time over his final two seasons with the Heat. Even granting that positions are fluid and classifying them within lineups is an inexact science, this means James has a history of being one of the biggest and most powerful players on the floor. But as a small-ball big man in that scheme, James retained all of his usual perimeter-star stats. So the next evolution for an aging James may be to shed some of those characteristics and adopt the statistical fingerprint of a true big man, accentuating existing tendencies such as playing off the ball, crashing the boards and focusing on efficiency over volume.
It’s not necessarily a change that will — or should — take hold this season, particularly because the Cavs are more stocked in the paint than on the perimeter and James has always resisted taking on the physical toll of being a full-time big man. But it could be the picture of what the most effective Old LeBron might look like. Because as hard as it can be to believe for those of us who watched James grow up in parallel with our own lives, the final act of his NBA story is just around the corner — and if it’s anything like his career to date, it’s going to be fascinating to watch.
Check out our NBA predictions.