Skip to main content
ABC News
Want To Avoid The Squeeze On Super Bowl Tickets? Wait And Hope

Balls aren’t the only things being squeezed ahead of this year’s Super Bowl. Ticket prices are, too.

Over the past 10 days, ticket prices for Super Bowl XLIX have skyrocketed, from an average of $2,799 the day of the AFC Championship to $4,594 Wednesday — an increase of 64 percent. The culprit? A “short squeeze.”


As reported by Bloomberg Business, the Super Bowl tickets you buy may not even exist — yet. Brokers often sell speculative — or “spec” — tickets. They’ll sell tickets they don’t have when prices are high and then buy them closer to the game, hoping prices are lower and thus fulfilling the transaction. Basically, they short sell tickets.

“Year after year after year, the market dips and usually those last couple of days before kickoff are the cheapest time to buy a ticket,” Connor Gregoire, an analyst at the ticket aggregator SeatGeek, told me. This is the broker’s incentive to sell short.

But a short squeeze can happen when a commodity — tickets, in this case — is heavily shorted. Then an unexpected increase in ticket prices can be further accelerated by brokers trying to get out of their now-risky short positions. They cut their losses. Demand is high and supply is low, putting upward pressure on price. That’s responsible for the recent spike. (You can explore ticket prices in depth at SeatGeek’s website.)

Brokers selling short has been unusually common this year, Gregoire said. Ira Boudway at Bloomberg suggests a couple of reasons for this. First, Arizona, the site of this year’s game, has been a weak venue in the past. Resale prices collapsed when the game was held there in 2008. And maybe the Super Bowl ticket market is now perceived as soft in general. The market for the game last year also fizzled out.

Brokers are big players in the ticket market. Teams often sell tickets in bulk to brokers. This eliminates risk from the teams’ books, and it’s much easier for them than selling tickets individually. For the Super Bowl, 35 percent of the tickets are allocated to the teams playing in the game — this year, the New England Patriots and Seattle Seahawks. Some of those are given to individual season ticket holders via a lottery. But the rest go to the brokers. The host team, the Arizona Cardinals, gets 5 percent. The rest of the teams in the NFL get 1.2 percent each.

We can see further evidence of the short squeeze in ticket prices for different types of seats. This year’s small spread between prices in the lower level and upper level of University of Phoenix Stadium is such evidence.

roeder-datalab-superbowltickets-2From 2011 to 2014, lower-deck tickets were 50, 45, 44 and 40 percent more expensive than those in the upper deck, respectively. This year it’s just 21 percent. (These figures are for the Wednesday night before the game each year. These are the “get-in” prices — the cheapest tickets in each section.)

“Given that most speculative selling occurred in the upper level, that’s where the squeeze is most dramatic. We’d normally see about double the percentage spread, but because that’s where brokers are most exposed, prices in the upper level have shot up much further, relatively, than prices in the lower level,” Gregoire said. “There have been moments since this past weekend when the difference between the least expensive upper- and lower-level seat was less than 10 percent, which just doesn’t add up. As the squeeze largely plays out in the upper level, the lower-level market plays catch-up, but not at the same rate.”

Spec ticket-selling can go awry in other ways, too. Before the 2011 BCS championship — Auburn vs. Oregon — StubHub briefly suspended trading for that game’s tickets. One broker, a large supplier of tickets to the site, was unable to deliver on the tickets he’d sold. To its credit, StubHub bought up as many tickets as it could to fulfill its customers’ orders.

It’s not completely clear why the short-squeeze effect is so pronounced this year. In other words, it’s not clear what caused an unexpected increase in short selling or demand in general. “It’s tough to say that there’s any identifiable, environmental cause for why it happened this year in particular,” said Gregoire. It may just be a shift in broker behavior. Or, heaven forfend …

Could it have been Deflate-gate? It’s true that phenomena not explicitly related to a game’s practical implications can bring added attention and affect prices. Recent examples include Derek Jeter’s last game and Mike Krzyzewski’s 1,000th win; ticket prices spiked in both cases. Deflate-gate has brought an acute, twisted kind of attention to Sunday’s game. But Gregoire is skeptical that it’s driving prices.

“I really think it would be overstating its impact on the market to say it had any meaningful impact on where prices have gone,” he said.

Nevertheless, seat geek Gregoire still expects a dip in prices. “If I were in a fan’s position right now, still looking for tickets, my advice would still be to hold off and wait until Friday or Saturday, after this short-selling situation is most likely resolved completely,” he said. “They’ll be able to get much better prices than what they see now.”

Oliver Roeder was a senior writer for FiveThirtyEight. He holds a Ph.D. in economics from the University of Texas at Austin, where he studied game theory and political competition.