For a better browsing experience, please upgrade your browser.

Skip to main content
Senate Races in 2014 Lack (Good) Polling

Democrat Alison Lundergan Grimes is running for Senate in Kentucky against incumbent Mitch McConnell, a Republican.

Luke Sharrett / Getty Images

Last month, I lamented the lack of polls in some key Senate races. Scarce polling makes it harder to get a clear picture of the Senate landscape. But is 2014 unusual?

So far this year, 53 percent of probable Senate matchups have been surveyed at least once. I went through the FiveThirtyEight polling archive and checked how many states had at least one poll from January to March of an election year. (Note: FiveThirtyEight’s polling database is as comprehensive as anyone’s — it has more than 4,485 Senate polls — but it is still likely to be missing some surveys).

At 53 percent, 2014’s Senate races are being polled about as often as in recent elections; four of the five election cycles since 2006 have seen more than 50 percent of races surveyed.


But many of the surveys conducted so far in 2014 — such as those by Rasmussen Reports and Public Policy Polling — are “robo-polls,” which use computers to autodial numbers and play a prerecorded message. By my count, roughly 75 percent of the Senate polls conducted this year have been automated.

Robo-polls are cheaper to conduct than live-interview surveys, but automated surveys have also been less accurate. Many don’t call cellphones, a methodology that tends to underestimate Democratic support.

This year, many states with potentially competitive Senate matchups, including Alaska, Colorado and Kentucky, have only been tested with robo-polls.

I plan to take a more systematic look at the proportion of robo-polls and live-interview surveys over the past several election cycles. But perhaps a lack of polling isn’t the real problem; it’s a lack of good polling.

Harry Enten is a senior political writer and analyst for FiveThirtyEight.

Filed under , , , ,

Comments Add Comment