For a better browsing experience, please upgrade your browser.

Last month, I lamented the lack of polls in some key Senate races. Scarce polling makes it harder to get a clear picture of the Senate landscape. But is 2014 unusual?

So far this year, 53 percent of probable Senate matchups have been surveyed at least once. I went through the FiveThirtyEight polling archive and checked how many states had at least one poll from January to March of an election year. (Note: FiveThirtyEight’s polling database is as comprehensive as anyone’s — it has more than 4,485 Senate polls — but it is still likely to be missing some surveys).

At 53 percent, 2014’s Senate races are being polled about as often as in recent elections; four of the five election cycles since 2006 have seen more than 50 percent of races surveyed.


But many of the surveys conducted so far in 2014 — such as those by Rasmussen Reports and Public Policy Polling — are “robo-polls,” which use computers to autodial numbers and play a prerecorded message. By my count, roughly 75 percent of the Senate polls conducted this year have been automated.

Robo-polls are cheaper to conduct than live-interview surveys, but automated surveys have also been less accurate. Many don’t call cellphones, a methodology that tends to underestimate Democratic support.

This year, many states with potentially competitive Senate matchups, including Alaska, Colorado and Kentucky, have only been tested with robo-polls.

I plan to take a more systematic look at the proportion of robo-polls and live-interview surveys over the past several election cycles. But perhaps a lack of polling isn’t the real problem; it’s a lack of good polling.

Comments Add Comment

Filed under , , , ,

Never miss the best of FiveThirtyEight.

Subscribe to the FiveThirtyEight Newsletter

Sign up for our newsletters to keep up with our favorite articles, charts and regressions. We have three on offer: a curated digest of the best of FiveThirtyEight from the past week; The Week In Data, our weekly look at the best data journalism from around the web; and Significant Digits, our roundup of numbers in the news. Enter your email below, and we’ll be in touch.

By clicking subscribe, you agree to the FanBridge Privacy Policy

Powered by VIP