Donald Trump is doing really well in the polls. But he’s doing even better in the polls he tweets about.
We looked at every Trump tweet related to polling from his mid-June entrance to the Republican presidential race through late Monday afternoon to figure out the extent to which Trump is cherry-picking favorable polls.1 We then compared the polls Trump tweeted about with the HuffPost Pollster polling aggregate for that contest on the same date. If Trump were tweeting polls at random, you’d expect them, on average, to match the Pollster aggregate.2 He’s not. Of the 161 polls that Trump has tweeted about, we found that:
- Trump did 2 percentage points better in the average poll he tweeted positively about (155) than the Pollster aggregate for the same race at the time of the tweet.3
- Trump did 3 percentage points worse, on average, than the Pollster aggregate the six times he bashed a poll. In all the polls he bashed, Trump fared worse than the Pollster aggregate.
- Trump’s poll-tweeting bias has grown over time. Through September, the average poll he tweeted approvingly was more favorable to him than the Pollster aggregate by less than a percentage point. Since October, the Trump tweet gap has risen to nearly 4 percentage points.
- Trump also likes to tweet or retweet about the same poll a lot. He tweeted 29 poll results that he approved of more than once. He also tweeted one poll (a September CNN national survey) favorably, before turning on it more than once to highlight a better poll result for him from NBC and SurveyMonkey.
- CNN is Trump’s favorite pollster, with its 28 references leading the 28 different pollsters whose results he has tweeted.
- As Trump’s polling has gotten better, his poll-related tweets have become more frequent: He has already made almost as many references to polls in tweets in December, halfway through the month, as he did in all of November.
Trump is far from the only candidate to cite favorable numbers that are misleading. And there’s a good reason he’s tweeting polling numbers so often: Cherry-picked or not, they generally contain better news about Trump’s chances than about his opponents’.