Skip to main content
ABC News
Murder Is Up Again In 2017, But Not As Much As Last Year

Big U.S. cities1 saw another increase in murders in the first half of 2017, likely putting them on track for a third straight year of rising totals after murder rates reached historic lows in 2014. So far, however, this year’s increase is considerably smaller than it was in each of the past two years; the big-city numbers are consistent with only a modest rise in murders nationwide. Overall, if recent numbers hold, the nation’s murder rate will likely rise but remain low relative to where it was from the late 1960s through the 1990s.

Murder in 2017

The FBI collects national data on murders2 and other major crimes, but it releases them after a significant lag. The most recent full year for which official data is available is 2015, when murders rose at their fastest pace in a quarter century. Official 2016 data won’t be available until the fall, but murder almost certainly rose last year too; in January, I found that big cities experienced a roughly 11 percent increase in murders in 2016, which past patterns suggest is consistent with about an 8 percent rise in murder overall.3

In order to gauge changes in the prevalence of murder in big cities in 2017, I collected year-to-date murder counts for 2017 and 2016 in 68 of the country’s big cities, using a mixture of data from the cities themselves and from media reports.4 Data from 63 of the cities included murders committed through at least the end of May, and 50 cities provided data covering the month of June. These big cities have had roughly 4 percent more murders so far in 2017 than they did at the same point in 2016.5

Only a handful of cities are seeing large increases or decreases in murder this year, which is what we would expect to see given a small overall rise in the sample.6

U.S. cities with biggest changes in murder rates at midyear
Baltimore +34 +26%
New Orleans +31 +46
Philadelphia +26 +20
Charlotte, NC +24 +104
Kansas City, MO +21 +41
New York -34 -22%
Houston -31 -20
Atlanta -21 -40
Newark, NJ -18 -40
Wichita, KS -15 -44

Change in first half of 2017 compared to first half of 2016.

Sources: Local police departments, media reports

St. Louis, Baltimore, New Orleans and Detroit have ranked among the top four cities in murder rate per 100,000 residents every year since 2014, and so far, 2017 does not appear to be any different. The table below shows the cities with the highest approximate murder rates so far in 2017, prorated over a full year.7

Big cities with highest murder rates in early 2017

Murder rates among cities with populations over 250,000 for which data was available

1 St. Louis 59.3 57.9 -1.4
2 Baltimore 51.2 55.5 +4.3
3 New Orleans 44.5 49.7 +5.2
4 Detroit 44.9 40.7 -4.2
5 Kansas City, MO 26.4 30.3 +3.9
6 Memphis, TN 31.9 28.1 -3.8
7 Cleveland 35.0 27.9 -7.1
8 Chicago 27.9 24.1 -3.8
9 Cincinnati 20.8 23.1 +2.3
10 Philadelphia 17.7 19.8 +2.1

Source: Local police departments and media reports

What midyear stats tell us

What can we really learn from a sample of big-city murder counts from midyear? The FBI has provided preliminary crime counts for the first six months of the year for each year since 2011. That isn’t enough to find any long-term trends, but the patterns do offer some hints about what the big-city sample suggests about the rest of the year.

First, there tend to be more murders in the second half of the year, when it’s warmer, especially in northern cities. Between 52 and 54 percent of big-city murders occurred in the second half of the year in every year between 2010 and 2015, according to the FBI’s data.8 So murder rates in those cities will likely ultimately be higher than the midyear statistics suggest.

Second, recent history suggests that not only does the absolute number of murders increase in the second half of the year, but the rate of increase also accelerates. The year-over-year rate of change in murder in big cities increased in the second half of each year from 2011 to 2015, regardless of whether murder was increasing or decreasing nationally. In other words, if the overall murder rate was rising, it rose faster in the second half of the year, and if the rate was falling, it fell slower in the second half of the year. In 2015, for example, in the 63 big cities that reported midyear data to the FBI, murder was up 11.8 percent at midyear and 15.1 percent at the end of the year. We can see this second-half acceleration in the FBI’s data for each year from 2011 to 2015 in the table below.

Murders accelerate in the second half of the year

The murder rate as measured at midyear tends to underestimate the actual annual rate among cities with populations over 250,000

2011 -4.1% -2.9% +1.2
2012 +3.2 +5.3 +2.0
2013 -11.7 -9.3 +2.4
2014 -4.4 -1.9 +2.4
2015 +11.8 +15.1 +3.2

Source: FBI

The national picture: We’re still near historic lows

Big cities tend to exaggerate national murder trends, both up and down — so a large rise in big-city murder usually corresponds with a slightly smaller national increase. If murder rose roughly 8 percent nationally in 2016 (as my January estimate suggests) and is set to rise a few percentage points in 2017, then the nation’s murder rate in 2017 will be roughly the same as it was in 2008. That’s still more than 40 percent lower than the country’s murder rate in the early 1990s (but roughly 27 percent higher than it was in 2014).

Ultimately, this year’s trend is similar to last year’s in that more big cities are seeing a rise in the number of murders than are seeing a decline. There are still six months left in 2017, and while anything could happen, the most likely outcome is that — although this year’s rise will likely be smaller than last year’s — the country will see murders increase for a third straight year.


  1. Which here is defined as cities with populations over 250,000 according to the FBI’s 2015 population estimates.

  2. The FBI defines murder as “the willful (nonnegligent) killing of one human being by another.” This does not include deaths caused by negligence, accidents or homicides deemed justifiable, such as a killing in self-defense.

  3. Big cities tend to exaggerate the overall national trend in murder, as Carl Bialik pointed out last January. We won’t know 2016’s national murder count for a few months, but the murder rate in big cities rose about 3 percentage points more than the the national trend the last three times murder rose nationally, which suggests that an 11 percent rise in murder in big cities will probably correspond with an increase of roughly 8 percent nationally.

  4. Twenty-nine cities provided data in response to email requests; 34 cities make their murder data available through a public portal; I used media sources for five cities. Fifteen cities didn’t make their data publicly available and either denied or didn’t respond to requests that they provide it.

  5. All murder counts are unofficial until formally submitted to the FBI at the end of the year.

  6. The 2016 Pulse nightclub attack in Orlando, in which 49 people were killed, was not counted for the purposes of this article. The FBI added a caveat to Orlando’s preliminary 2016 murder count by saying, “The 2016 murder offenses include those victims of the Pulse Nightclub incident; therefore, figures are not comparable to previous years’ data.”

  7. Murder rates were calculated using the FBI’s population calculations for 2015.

  8. To determine this, I compared the midyear murder counts with the final, year-end data for the big cities in our sample.

Jeff Asher is based in New Orleans and used to work for the city as a crime analyst. He currently does crime analysis for the Jefferson Parish Sheriff’s Office and runs the NOLA Crime News data analysis blog.