Welcome to our Election Update for Thursday, Oct. 25! Democrats currently have a 5 in 6 chance (84 percent) to flip the House. That’s a little lower than Monday’s mark of 87 percent. Their average gain is 38 seats.
Many of those gains will be because of women. Women appear poised to vote for Democrats in record numbers this year, and many of the candidates themselves are women. The 116th Congress could have a record number of female legislators; at present, the historical high-water mark is the 107 women (84 in the House, 23 in the Senate) currently serving in the 115th Congress.
Our model agrees that it’s likely that a historic number of women will serve in the next Congress, but how many female legislators can we expect? Using gender data that we collected with Ballotpedia earlier this year, we identified 238 women from major parties (186 Democrats, 52 Republicans) running for the House. Then, using our House forecast,1 we compiled a list that’s impressive for its length: all the women favored to win2 a House seat this year.
A potentially record-breaking roster of women in the House
Female candidates in 2018 House races with at least a 1 in 2 chance of winning, according to FiveThirtyEight’s forecast as of Oct. 24
Candidate | District | Party | Incumbent? | Female Opponent? | Chance of Winning |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Ayanna Pressley | MA-7 | D | 100.0% | ||
Frederica Wilson | FL-24 | D | вÑâ | 100.0 | |
Kathy Castor | FL-14 | D | вÑâ | 100.0 | |
Lois Frankel | FL-21 | D | вÑâ | 100.0 | |
Terri A. Sewell | AL-7 | D | вÑâ | 100.0 | |
Val Demings | FL-10 | D | вÑâ | 100.0 | |
Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez | NY-14 | D | >99.9 | ||
Sheila Jackson Lee | TX-18 | D | вÑâ | вÑâ | >99.9 |
Marcia L. Fudge | OH-11 | D | вÑâ | вÑâ | >99.9 |
Tulsi Gabbard | HI-2 | D | вÑâ | >99.9 | |
Diana DeGette | CO-1 | D | вÑâ | >99.9 | |
Anna G. Eshoo | CA-18 | D | вÑâ | вÑâ | >99.9 |
Pramila Jayapal | WA-7 | D | вÑâ | >99.9 | |
Jackie Speier | CA-14 | D | вÑâ | вÑâ | >99.9 |
Robin Kelly | IL-2 | D | вÑâ | >99.9 | |
Carolyn Maloney | NY-12 | D | вÑâ | >99.9 | |
Ilhan Omar | MN-5 | D | вÑâ | >99.9 | |
Joyce Beatty | OH-3 | D | вÑâ | >99.9 | |
Jan Schakowsky | IL-9 | D | вÑâ | >99.9 | |
Grace F. Napolitano | CA-32 | D | вÑâ | >99.9 | |
Zoe Lofgren | CA-19 | D | вÑâ | >99.9 | |
Nancy Pelosi | CA-12 | D | вÑâ | вÑâ | >99.9 |
Yvette Clarke | NY-9 | D | вÑâ | >99.9 | |
Brenda Lawrence | MI-14 | D | вÑâ | >99.9 | |
Maxine Waters | CA-43 | D | вÑâ | >99.9 | |
Karen Bass | CA-37 | D | вÑâ | >99.9 | |
Marcy Kaptur | OH-9 | D | вÑâ | >99.9 | |
Gwen Moore | WI-4 | D | вÑâ | >99.9 | |
Doris Matsui | CA-6 | D | вÑâ | >99.9 | |
Judy Chu | CA-27 | D | вÑâ | >99.9 | |
Nanette Barragan | CA-44 | D | вÑâ | вÑâ | >99.9 |
Nydia Velazquez | NY-7 | D | вÑâ | >99.9 | |
Rashida Tlaib | MI-13 | D | >99.9 | ||
Norma J. Torres | CA-35 | D | вÑâ | >99.9 | |
Bonnie Watson Coleman | NJ-12 | D | вÑâ | >99.9 | |
Debbie Dingell | MI-12 | D | вÑâ | >99.9 | |
Katherine Clark | MA-5 | D | вÑâ | >99.9 | |
Linda T. Sanchez | CA-38 | D | вÑâ | >99.9 | |
Kay Granger | TX-12 | R | вÑâ | вÑâ | >99.9 |
Alma Adams | NC-12 | D | вÑâ | >99.9 | |
Barbara Lee | CA-13 | D | вÑâ | вÑâ | >99.9 |
Susan A. Davis | CA-53 | D | вÑâ | вÑâ | >99.9 |
Mary Gay Scanlon | PA-5 | D | вÑâ | >99.9 | |
Veronica Escobar | TX-16 | D | >99.9 | ||
Sylvia R. Garcia | TX-29 | D | >99.9 | ||
Grace Meng | NY-6 | D | вÑâ | >99.9 | |
Eddie Bernice Johnson | TX-30 | D | вÑâ | >99.9 | |
Betty McCollum | MN-4 | D | вÑâ | >99.9 | |
Liz Cheney | WY-1 | R | вÑâ | >99.9 | |
Rosa DeLauro | CT-3 | D | вÑâ | >99.9 | |
Suzanne Bonamici | OR-1 | D | вÑâ | >99.9 | |
Dina Titus | NV-1 | D | вÑâ | вÑâ | >99.9 |
Nita Lowey | NY-17 | D | вÑâ | >99.9 | |
Julia Brownley | CA-26 | D | вÑâ | >99.9 | |
Debbie Wasserman Schultz | FL-23 | D | вÑâ | >99.9 | |
Lucille Roybal-Allard | CA-40 | D | вÑâ | >99.9 | |
Cheri Bustos | IL-17 | D | вÑâ | >99.9 | |
Vicky Hartzler | MO-4 | R | вÑâ | вÑâ | >99.9 |
Lori Trahan | MA-3 | D | >99.9 | ||
Kathleen Rice | NY-4 | D | вÑâ | >99.9 | |
Suzan DelBene | WA-1 | D | вÑâ | 99.9 | |
Chellie Pingree | ME-1 | D | вÑâ | 99.9 | |
Madeleine Dean | PA-4 | D | 99.9 | ||
Lisa Blunt Rochester | DE-1 | D | вÑâ | 99.7 | |
Annie Kuster | NH-2 | D | вÑâ | 99.5 | |
Chrissy Houlahan | PA-6 | D | 98.8 | ||
Susan W. Brooks | IN-5 | R | вÑâ | вÑâ | 98.7 |
Debra A. Haaland | NM-1 | D | вÑâ | 98.1 | |
Martha Roby | AL-2 | R | вÑâ | вÑâ | 97.3 |
Jahana Hayes | CT-5 | D | 96.9 | ||
Abby Finkenauer | IA-1 | D | 96.6 | ||
Ann Kirkpatrick | AZ-2 | D | вÑâ | 96.2 | |
Virginia Foxx | NC-5 | R | вÑâ | вÑâ | 95.5 |
Susan Ellis Wild | PA-7 | D | 95.4 | ||
Jackie Walorski | IN-2 | R | вÑâ | 95.4 | |
Stephanie Murphy | FL-7 | D | вÑâ | 94.3 | |
Katie Arrington | SC-1 | R | 90.0 | ||
Elise Stefanik | NY-21 | R | вÑâ | вÑâ | 88.5 |
Jennifer T. Wexton | VA-10 | D | вÑâ | 87.9 | |
Carol Devine Miller | WV-3 | R | 87.9 | ||
Ann Wagner | MO-2 | R | вÑâ | 86.6 | |
Mikie Sherrill | NJ-11 | D | 84.8 | ||
Angie Craig | MN-2 | D | 84.0 | ||
Donna Shalala | FL-27 | D | вÑâ | 79.4 | |
Haley Stevens | MI-11 | D | вÑâ | 78.8 | |
Sharice Davids | KS-3 | D | 77.8 | ||
Karen Handel | GA-6 | R | вÑâ | вÑâ | 76.9 |
Cathy McMorris Rodgers | WA-5 | R | вÑâ | вÑâ | 76.7 |
Debbie Lesko | AZ-8 | R | вÑâ | вÑâ | 75.9 |
Jaime Herrera Beutler | WA-3 | R | вÑâ | вÑâ | 74.8 |
Katie Hill | CA-25 | D | 71.8 | ||
Susie Lee | NV-3 | D | 71.4 | ||
Katie Porter | CA-45 | D | вÑâ | 64.4 | |
Cindy Axne | IA-3 | D | 61.3 | ||
Mia B. Love | UT-4 | R | вÑâ | 59.5 | |
Debbie Mucarsel-Powell | FL-26 | D | 56.2 | ||
Yvette Herrell | NM-2 | R | вÑâ | 54.7 | |
Amy McGrath | KY-6 | D | 52.3 | ||
Elissa Slotkin | MI-8 | D | 50.9 | ||
Kim Schrier | WA-8 | D | 50.0 |
If every woman currently leading a district were to end up winning, there would be 100 women in the House, plus 24 in the Senate.Senate forecast, the Senate would lose one woman in Heidi Heitkamp, but it would gain two in Marsha Blackburn and Kyrsten Sinema.
">3 That totals 124 women in Congress, which easily blows past the current count of 107.But this kind of seat gain isn’t guaranteed. Women could gain dozens of seats — but they might also add only a handful. For example, say we limit our forecast data to women with 3 in 4 chances of winning or better; there would be only 115 women in the next Congress. That would still be a historic high, with 92 female representatives compared with 84, but it would mean no gains for women in the Senate4 and only eight more seats overall. On the other hand, let’s assume that every woman with at least a 1 in 4 chance ends up prevailing. In this more optimistic scenario for women, there could be 120 congresswomen and 26 female senators on Jan. 3, 2019. That total of 146 women would be a 36 percent increase over the current number — but it’s worth noting that, even under this scenario, Congress would still be nowhere near gender parity.
As my colleague Perry Bacon Jr. has written, progress in electing more women to Congress has come mostly on the Democratic side of the aisle. As you can see in the chart below, the number of Republican women in Congress has plateaued since the 1990s (when the first “Year of the Woman” in 1992 was also Democrat-fueled), while Democratic women have made steady gains even as the number of Democratic men has shrunk.

Our forecast suggests that trend will continue: Assuming all 100 forecast leaders win their House races, 83 of the next session’s congresswomen will be Democrats, compared with just 17 who will be Republicans. Currently, of the 84 total congresswomen, there are 61 Democrats and 23 Republicans; that means that the gain would be among Democratic women, while the number of Republican women would actually decrease. If our model is correct, the ratio of Democratic congresswomen to Republican congresswomen will the be highest it has ever been.