FiveThirtyEight
Nathaniel Rakich

If you’re wondering why John Eisenberg, the White House counsel to whom multiple people apparently raised concerns about the phone call, isn’t testifying: The White House instructed him not to, citing the fact that he is such a close adviser to the president.

Rick Klein

MaryAlice, the RNC is circulating a Washington Examiner story pointing out “gaps in Vindman’s knowledge” and calling him “a creature of a bureaucracy that has often opposed President Trump.” Their basic argument seems to be that Vindman opposed Trump’s policy.

MaryAlice Parks

Question for you, Rick: Has the RNC provided any evidence for its claim that Vindman isn’t credible?


Exit mobile version