FiveThirtyEight
Ilya Marritz

Vindman affirms that he knows of no evidence that Ukraine interfered in the 2016 campaign.

That contradicts something Nunes said in his opening statement, that there had been “meddling” by Ukrainians and the evidence is being suppressed in these hearings.

Nathaniel Rakich

And Vindman also says that there was nothing about Biden in Trump’s talking points for the call, and that Trump’s request was “not consistent” with U.S. policy.

Perry Bacon Jr.

Vindman just completely rejected the GOP argument that somehow Ukraine improperly interfered in the 2016 election to help Clinton and hurt Trump. He is being much less cautious than Williams in his testimony.


Exit mobile version