What Went Down On Day 1 Of The Impeachment Hearings

From the start, Nunes is not challenging the idea that the U.S. should strongly support Ukraine against Russia. Indeed he is arguing that Trump has acted in line with that policy. It’s notable that challenging that foreign policy position in this hearing seems to be a bridge too far Nunes, even though reporting about Trump’s views and the witness testimony this morning conflicts with that.

I’m piggy-backing on smart Amelia comments here, but I continue think this current Nunes line — the president was concerned about foreign interference, hence everything here is fine and normal — is Republicans’ best line of defense. There’s not any evidence to support it, and it doesn’t really pass the smell test, but how do you prove what was in Trump’s head? You just end up in an empirical dead end of sorts.

A couple of lines of attack to watch out for as Republicans begin their defense of Trump: 1) the process is unfair to Trump; 2) all of these witnesses’ knowledge is secondhand or thirdhand; 3) Trump’s communications with Zelensky were perfectly normal.