Updated |
What Went Down On Health Care This Week
A Conference Committee Could Take A While
If the health care bill ends up in a conference committee between the House and the Senate, it could be a while before a final bill is agreed to by both chambers. Since 1980, reconciliation bills that have passed both chambers and then gone to a conference committee have taken anywhere from three days to 126 days between original passage (the date that the second chamber passed the bill) and final passage.
Reconciliation bills that went to conference committee
| FISCAL YEAR | ORIGINAL PASSAGE BY BOTH CHAMBERS | FINAL PASSAGE BY BOTH CHAMBERS | DAYS ELAPSED | DAYS ELAPSED |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1981 | September 17, 1980 | December 3, 1980 | 77 | |
| 1982 | July 13, 1981 | July 31, 1981 | 18 | |
| 1983 | July 23, 1982 | August 19, 1982 | 27 | |
| 1983 | August 11, 1982 | August 18, 1982 | 7 | |
| 1986 | November 14, 1985 | March 20, 1986 | 126 | |
| 1987 | September 25, 1986 | October 17, 1986 | 22 | |
| 1988 | December 11, 1987 | December 22, 1987 | 11 | |
| 1990 | October 13, 1989 | November 22, 1989 | 40 | |
| 1991 | October 19, 1990 | October 27, 1990 | 8 | |
| 1994 | June 25, 1993 | August 6, 1993 | 42 | |
| 1996 | October 28, 1995 | November 20, 1995 | 23 | |
| 1997 | July 23, 1996 | August 1, 1996 | 9 | |
| 1998 | June 25, 1997 | July 31, 1997 | 36 | |
| 1998 | June 27, 1997 | July 31, 1997 | 34 | |
| 2000 | July 30, 1999 | August 5, 1999 | 6 | |
| 2001 | July 18, 2000 | July 21, 2000 | 3 | |
| 2002 | May 23, 2001 | May 26, 2001 | 3 | |
| 2004 | May 15, 2003 | May 23, 2003 | 8 | |
| 2006 | November 18, 2005 | February 1, 2006 | 75 | |
| 2006 | February 2, 2006 | May 11, 2006 | 98 | |
| 2008 | July 20, 2007 | September 7, 2007 | 49 | |
| Average | 34 |
About Those Waivers …
The Senate may be preparing to include changes to some complicated but consequential waivers in the “skinny bill” it’s writing. A little explanation about what those are:
One provision of Obamacare was that states can apply for waivers to many of the health insurance regulations in the law if they want to experiment with different models of health coverage. They can be used to waive the Essential Health Benefits, or to change the subsidies to help low-income people buy insurance. The trick is that in order to be approved, states must show that at least as many would be covered as under the normal rules, and that the coverage would be at least as affordable and as comprehensive, all without increasing the federal deficit.
A previous iteration of the Senate bill (one that effectively failed earlier this week) included changes to those waivers. Under that plan, states would have been able waive the regulations so long as they showed it wouldn’t increase the federal deficit. States would only need to write a description of how the new model would address the other issues of who is covered, how much it would cost and what that coverage would look like. It’s not yet clear whether the provision in the bill being written today would be similar.
The Senate reportedly hasn’t written the draft legislation for the “skinny bill” we’ve been talking about for the last couple of days, but information is starting to trickle out on what it might include. The bill is widely expected to include a repeal of the individual mandate. According to Axios, it would also defund Planned Parent for a year and expand waivers that states can apply for in order to get around the regulations on the insurance market imposed by Obamacare, though it’s not clear what those waivers would allow.
There are at least two problems in there for the GOP: One, the Senate parliamentarian has said defunding Planned Parenthood doesn’t comply with Senate rules, meaning it would need 60 votes to pass. And two, the parliamentarian has also ruled that the waivers don’t comply with the rules.
