FiveThirtyEight
Geoffrey Skelley

“Y’all did it for me,” Biden says, apparently reading the Nevada result as a win for him. It seems like he might be on track to get second or third, so I guess it’s better than fourth and fifth, like in Iowa and New Hampshire?

Nathaniel Rakich

Yeah, Kaleigh, I think the whole “three sets of election results” thing might have set caucus states up to fail no matter what. In addition to adding time to the process, it made it possible for people to catch errors in the results, since the votes-to-delegates conversion process was completely transparent.

Kaleigh Rogers

It’s worth pointing out that, like Iowa, there were a number of changes this year that might explain the delays over 2016. First of all, precincts once again have to report three sets of data, instead of just one. There’s also the new quirk of incorporating early votes, which led to some confusion on site according to various reports, and volunteers were given new technology in the form of a Google-based calculator accessed via iPads. And, lastly, we’ve heard at least a few reports that the hotline has been jammed. All of this means it makes sense that results would be coming in much later than in past years.


Exit mobile version