At The New York Times, the Upshot’s model still has Clinton narrowly favored in Indiana because of outstanding votes in Indianapolis and Lake County. But let’s suppose Sanders pulls it out and wins a narrow victory instead, claiming 42 of Indiana’s 83 pledged delegates. He’d still then need 611 of the remaining 933 pledged delegates to catch Clinton, or about two-thirds. Here’s a scenario for what that would look like: Sanders would need to win California by 31 percentage points, for instance, and New Jersey by double digits despite having lost every neighboring state.
| DATE | STATE | PLEDGED DELEGATES AVAILABLE | SANDERS TARGET | POPULAR VOTE MARGIN REQUIRED TO HIT DELEGATE TARGET |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 7 | Guam | 7 | 5 | Sanders +43 |
| May 10 | West Virginia | 29 | 22 | Sanders +52 |
| May 17 | Kentucky | 55 | 37 | Sanders +35 |
| Oregon | 61 | 48 | Sanders +57 | |
| June 4 | Virgin Islands | 7 | 5 | Sanders +43 |
| June 5 | Puerto Rico | 60 | 35 | Sanders +17 |
| June 7 | California | 475 | 312 | Sanders +31 |
| Montana | 21 | 17 | Sanders +62 | |
| New Jersey | 126 | 71 | Sanders +13 | |
| New Mexico | 34 | 20 | Sanders +18 | |
| South Dakota | 20 | 14 | Sanders +40 | |
| North Dakota | 18 | 15 | Sanders +67 | |
| June 14 | District of Columbia | 20 | 10 | Tie |
